A movie review of the film The Insider Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

A movie review of the film The Insider - Essay ExampleThe film revolves nigh two people Wigand, who was deep fired from a tobacco corporation, and Bergman, a veteran reporter in search of a story. The bolt that Wigand admits in his possession is the information that Chief Executive Officers of tobacco corporations The Big Seven had get alongn totally along that tobacco was addictive but had concealed this information from the public. From there, the story unfolded masterfully telling in gripping fashion how the influences of m maviny and the juristic system bore down on Wigand and Bergman, all in order to suppress the truth. Wigand was even the playing area of extreme character assassination and despite his attempts to live a quiet life as a professor, was always followed by the story he chose to tell. He became the subject of death threats, the FBI was on his trail, his personal life was in disarray. In the meantime, a bigger context was unfolding. at that place was a la wsuit poised to be filed against the Big Seven in order to recover what the recite paid in medical expenses to treat tobacco-related illnesses. Two legal creations then emerged from the movie. The first one is the concept of tortuous interference which basically means that if two parties have an agreement, and a third party induces a party privy to and bound by that agreement to break that agreement, that third party may be made liable for damages. That legal concept is used in connect to the confidential agreement, which is the second legal concept featured in this movie. In the film, Wigand was bound by an iron-clad confidentiality agreement that he was made to marker with his former company. The movie then forces its viewers to reflect are there limits to a confidentiality agreement? What happens when a confidentiality agreement comes into conflict with public welfare, public health, or even simply the right of the public to know? It is important to situate the movie against the larger social backdrop on which it operates. The movie came out in the late 1990s a period in history when tobacco politics had reached a of import juncture. It was at this period that the impunity of the tobacco firms to lawsuit had ended and for the first time, they were being held liable for the addictive consequences of cigarettes. How hazardous really is tobacco? As early as 1964, the U.S. Surgeon General had come out with a landmark report that spoke of the dangers of smoking on ones health and issued a mat statement against its use and its spread. In an article, it was stated that Each year three million people around the world die from tobacco-related illnesses. In the US, tobacco kills more than 400,000 people each year, and medical care for tobacco-related illnesses cost $50 billion annually. The World Health Organization projects that the yearly death toll from tobacco allow for rise to 10 million by the 2020swith seven million of those deaths striking economical ly poor countries. Of the one million US teens hooked each year on cigarettes, one-third or more pull up stakes eventually die from tobacco-related illnesses. If current trends continue, over 200 million of todays children and teenagers around the world will set down their lives to this addictive product. (InFact 1997) Despite these findings, the tobacco corporations have won every single legal battle against attempts to hold them accountable for putting public health in jeopardy. It is said that Philip Morris and other tobacco corporati